Monday, December 18, 2006

The Painted Veil

In today's Hollywood Reporter, Anne Thompson has a rundown on the spat between Bob Yari and Warner Brothers over The Painted Veil. Yuri alleges WB isn't mounting the Oscar campaign they promised; he says, "Someone up there wants the film buried." WB's Alan Horn says it isn't true -- he blames the China for Veil's release delay and slow-moving marketing campaign. Warner China, a partnership between WB and the China Film Group, co-produced the film, providing unprecedented location access in exchange for final cut approval for the Chinese government. Director John Curran and producer/star Edward Norton allegedly haggled with Chinese censors over "38 seconds over six scenes," with Norton appealing to "family friend" Dick Parsons for help; Parson's lobbying apparently meant nothing to the Chinese government, and a compromise was reached. The film opens in New York on Wednesday.

It strikes me as strange that WB doesn't have more faith in The Painted Veil as an Oscar contender. It certainly *looks* like Oscar bait, at least on paper: it's a vanity project nurtured by Norton for the better part of a decade, based on a novel by Somerset Maugham; it's a romance set against a sweeping, exotic locale with slight politcal undertones; and, it's a vehicle for two Oscar-nominated stars (Norton and Naomi Watts), one which allows both to demonstrate they can emote in early-20th-century costume. In practice, it's a visually sumptuous mangling of Maugham with a handful of memorable moments; it's extremely classy, but mostly brainless. In short, it's Oscar gold.

About three-quarters of the way through, there's a lovely sequence no more than ten minutes long, in which the characters played by Watts and Norton -- who have spent the previous 70 minutes of the film blaming one another for their loveless marriage, with Watts' adulterous Kitty essentially held prisoner by Norton in a rural Chinese village in the middle of a cholera epidemic -- get drunk and tumble into bed, and proceed to float into what is essentially a courtship montage. Curran puts the sequence together almost like a silent film, foregoing meaningful dialogue in order to impart information through the clanging harmony of Eric Satie's Gnossienne and Watts' batting eyelashes. That sequence redeemed The Painted Veil for me, at least up to a point; there's always some pleasure to be had in watching good-looking people convincingly fall in love, and in this case, Curran and his actors manage the transition from ecstasy to inevitable tragedy nicely.

It's worth wondering why Norton, an actor who could probably have any role he likes, spent so many years of his life fighting to bring this novel to the screen. In typical Maugham fashion, aspects of the story, and especially its view of male/female relations, are at once alarmingly anachronistic and embarrassingly timeless. At some point, a decision was made to truncate much of Kitty's third act, ostensibly to beef up Norton's role and to take better advantage of the secured Chinese locations. As a result, Kitty's spiritual redemption, which is supposed to be the point of the thing, feels barely sketched out. Maugham's usual passion/contempt for women (or, perhaps more accurately, passion for contemptible women) is on display here, but the novel's turn towards genuine sympathy for its heroine is almost completely lost.

In movie form, Kitty is at best selfish and shallow, with even her eventual turn to charity coming off as little more than a self-serving effort to eliminate boredom. She seems to accept Walter's proposal initially because she assumes she'll be her husband's constant object of desire, not realizing that he's a serious man looking to acquire a piece of designer arm candy. Norton's Walter is pretty much the typical Maugham "hero": a seemingly weak man who lets himself fall for an insouciant woman, and then punishes both of them for her inability to care for him. Walter and Kitty don't fall in love because Kitty has become a different, better person; Kitty and Walter fall in love because Kitty's display of beauty and vivacity moves Walter to temporarily forget that this woman makes him hate himself. This is vintage Maugham; what's interesting is that the filmmakers chose to end the narrative with Walter's death, thus leaving Kitty, pregnant with what is quite possibly another man's baby, alive and redeemed by the love her martyred husband. Remarkably, Maugham actually gave the girl a bit more credit than that.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Friday, December 15, 2006

Morning Links, 12-15-06


  • That Little Round-Headed Boy has produced the first end-of-year wrap list that I actually enjoyed reading.
  • The Dreamgirls backlash marches on: Ryan Stewart, Aaron Hillis and Tony Scott collectively shrug. As usual, Dave Kehr has the best 25-words-or-less summation: "Jamie Foxx is in it because he won an Oscar a couple of years ago, and Eddie Murphy is in it to prove he’s not turning into Bill Cosby."
  • This is interesting: Variety asks a few critics to name films that shouldn't have won Oscars, and films that didn't that should have.
  • Manohla's really on a roll lately. She neatly sums up the problem with The Good German thusly: "Yet while the language routinely waxes raw in The Good German, the most striking difference between it and a Hollywood film like Casablanca aren’t the expletives, the new film’s calculated cynicism or even that glimpse of bedroom coupling; it’s that the older film feels as if it was made for the satisfaction of the audience while the other feels as if it was made for that of the director alone."

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

National Board of Review Resurrects Clint Eastwood's Oscar Hopes

Wow ... the National Board of Review Awards came out this afternoon, and the slate is full of surprises. Biggest of all comes in the biggest category: Clint Eastwood's Letters from Iwo Jima for Best Picture? Seriously? It's a film that virtually no one has been talking about, largely because its companion film, Flags of Our Fathers, basically came and went when released earlier this fall. The film was originally scheduled to open in February, but Warner Brothers recently moved the released date up to December 20, apparently due to the hunch that Flags isn't going to attract any significant awards attention.

The trades haven't reviewed Iwo Jima yet. In mid-October, David Poland devoted almost 2000 words to explaining why Clint Eastwood can't pull off war movies; a couple of weeks later, he postulated that Iwo Jima (which as of that writing, he had not seen) "could be a film that critics are craving… an agreed upon serious film without the vote-splitting love/hate thing going on with Babel and Little Children. And if New York or L.A.['s critics circles] or both went for Iwo Jima as their Best Picture, suddenly it is in serious Oscar play."

At this point, I don't think either Babel or Little Children has any real chance to break through the twin roadblocks of The Departed and Dreamgirls; though it's still unseen by pretty much everyone *but* the National Board of Review, the blessing of that org might just be the push the Eastwood film needs to break this race wide open. At this point, I don't think anything else set to be released in the next three weeks could manage it.

Other WTF? items on NBR's list: Djimon Hounso of Blood Diamond and Catherine O'Hara from For Your Consideration were named the Best Supporting Actors; Blood Diamond and Flags of Our Fathers made the 10 Best Films list (that might give the former a credibility with art house audiences that its middling reviews have not); Dreamgirls and The Queen did not.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Monday, December 04, 2006

Why Doesn't Martin Scorsese Want WB To Buy Him An Oscar?


The bushy-browed auteur has been nominated for an Academy Award in the Best Director category six times but has never snagged a statuette. Now, sources close to him are saying Scorsese has requested that Warner Bros. not promote him for The Departed, the highest-grossing and, in the view of many critics, most audience-friendly film of his career.

My guess is that this is some sort of reverse psych move -- Miramax promoted the hell out of him twice and nothing came of it; now, maybe Marty figures he'll back as far away from Oscar campaigning as possible, and the statue will somehow fall in his lap. Hell, it worked for Roman Polanski...

Radar, via IFC Blog

Labels: , ,


Continue reading...