Wednesday, December 27, 2006

The National Film Registry has announced their 2006 list of inductees, and whilst Dave Kehr can't resist turning up his nose at the body's annual, token appeals to populism ("Now remind me: what was the historic importance of Blazing Saddles? The first fart joke in a major studio film?"), I find the list to be, once again, the most fascinatingly schizophrenic document of film historiography since ... um ... last year's list, I guess.

For those of you who don't await the NFR's annual press release with bated breath, and/or are perhaps unaware of how this nebulous government-sponsored preservation board functions, or why, allow me to quote directly from their website:

Librarian of Congress James H. Billington seeks nominations for the National Film Registry. To be eligible for the Registry, a film must be at least 10 years old and be "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant." The number of public votes a film receives is a factor weighed during the selection process.

At a press conference today, Billington stressed the need to physically perserve films as relics of the past; it's about maintaining quality prints, almost irregardless of the perceived quality of the content imprinted on them. Which I think is GREAT -- throw it all together. Acknowlege that high and low brow, commerical and independent, would be substantively indistinguishable were we not all -- and not just you and me, but anyone living in a world steeped in moving imagery -- de facto film scholars with an ingrained knowledge of How Hollywood Works. Rocky on the same shelf as Reminiscences of a Journey to Lithuania? Perfect.

This year's roster also includes the charmingly scrappy debut from a sharply underrated studio hack; star-studded candy for pre-Code fetishists; a silent satire of Hollywood by Josef Von Sternberg; and two decent 90s AmerIndies from wildly overrated filmmakers. Plus, St. Louis Blues, which allegedly contains the only existing filmed record of Bessie Smith singing, and Harold Ramis' masterpiece.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

James Brown: The Round-Up



  • It took Spike Lee roughly 30 hours to turn the death of James Brown into a paying gig: last night Brian Grazer announced he's handing the director his long-in-gestation Brown biopic. Spike won't be able to get to it until he's finished memorializing the L.A. riots and sequelizing Inside Man.
  • Chris Campbell takes a brief looksee at Brown's filmography at Cinematical. Above:
  • the incredible "Living in America" sequence from Rocky IV, in which every character but Brown and Apollo Creed seem to be thinking, "Jesus fucking Christ."
  • Brown's lawyer is blocking the mother of the singer's 5 year old son from his estate. Apparently, Brown's ladyfriend was married to another man at the time she and Brown exchanged vows, thus rendering the union invalid and her automatic legal access to his assets void.

Labels: , ,


Continue reading...

Morning Links, 12-27-06


  • Hey, Factory Girl opens in two days -- in Los Angeles only. Harvey apparently thinks he can get Sienna an Oscar nom is he keeps this debacle away from the NY press. Sienna is seen above reacting to the news with something less than enthusiasm. [via MCN Indie]
  • Perfume, which I haven't seen, is getting shitty reviews. The ever-astute Ed Gonzales rants at Slant: "That Jean-Baptiste takes to women so strongly would suggest that he has some sort of sex drive, but in failing to show [actor] Whishaw's cock during a crucial scene, does Tykwer, in pandering to the censors, also mean to imply that the perpetually sweaty Jean-Baptiste is either a eunuch or has never taken a whiff of his own spunk? An unlikely story."
  • Matt Dentler, the king of SXSW film, has canvassed the film community and is posting their (our?) picks for the best albums of 2006 every day between now and New Year's. I'm honored to have my lineup wedged between the lists of Steven Cantor (co-director of the excellent Pixies doc loudQUIETloud) and Bob "Mr. Show" Odenkirk.

Labels: , , , , ,


Continue reading...

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Late Afternoon Lists (or, catching up on a full feed reader after almost 5 days away)

At the Facets blog, Brian Elza puts Eyes Wide Shut at number 4 on his list of Holiday Flicks For Cool Kids. "Nicole Kidman stops the show by forcefully saying “Fuck” in what appears to be a giant FAO Schwarz toy store. That’s holiday gold, Stanley." Above: my favorite picture of Tom and Nicole, and possibly my favorite picture of any celebrity couple, ever.

Guy Maddin shares space with Miami Vice on Manohla's Top Ten

Diet Coke and Mentos top Scott Kirsner's list of Ten Pivotal Events of 2006, From The Intersection of Entertainment and Technology.

Scroll down for more entries to the 2006 indieWIRE blog poll.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Friday, December 22, 2006

The 2006 indieWIRE Blog Poll

Tom Hall is organizing a blogger Best of 2006 pool at indieWIRE; below you'll find my entry, with some added notes.

Best Film: The Science of Sleep, dir. Michel Gondry

9 runners up, in no order:

Children of Men
Marie Antoinette
The Queen
The Departed
Wristcutters: A Love Story
Mutual Appreciation
Sleeping Dogs Lie
Old Joy
Factotum

Best Performance: Gael Garcia Bernal, The Science of Sleep
There wasn't a single performance as impressive as Bernal's complete surrender to Gondry's madness, but Matt Dillon's work in Factotum also deserves a mention, as do Helen Mirren and Michael Sheen for their work in The Queen.

Best Supporting Performance: Alain Chabat, The Science of Sleep
It helps that Gondry's script, which otherwise suffered a bit from the filmmaker's wealth of ideas, gave him some of the best lines of the year. Close runners-up: Vera Fermiga, The Departed; Eddie Murphy, Dreamgirls

Best Director: Sofia Coppola, Marie Antoinette
The most undeservedly undervalued film of 2006 is also the year's purest auteur vision. Is it self-indulgent? Sure. That doesn't make it any less of a masterpiece. Close runners-up: Martin Scorsese, Michel Gondry, David Lynch (whose Inland Empire I greatly admire, but can't bring myself to enjoy)

Best Screenplay: Peter Morgan, The Queen
A stunning work of revisionist history which manages to produce sympathy for both Queen Elizabeth and Tony Blair, even as it's subtly yet sharply indicting the latter for failing to live up to the promise of his first months in office. Close runner-up: Andrew Bujalski, Mutual Appreciation; the eight people who worked on Children of Men.

Best Documentary: The Road to Guantanamo
I have trouble classifying Michael Winterbottom's dramatization as a doc, but it's still the most impressive non-fiction film I've seen this year. Close runners-up: Iraq in Fragments, Jesus Camp

Best First Film: Brick, Rian Johnson
This was a tough category for me, but I went with Johnson's breakthrough (which I think I would have loved more if I hadn't seen it at the horrible Angelica, with the subway rumbling underneath and someone's head blocking the screen) for its uncompromising committment to style. I also can't get enough of Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

Best Cinematography: Emmanuel Lubezki, Children of Men
If you've seen it, you know. If you haven't, go this weekend.

Best Undistributed Film: Wristcutters: A Love Story
I'm absolutely baffled as to why this film has remained largely unseen. Where Little Miss Sunshine hits every indie roadtrip cliche as if going down a list, Wristcutters transcends its subgenre brilliantly. I'm about ready to start my own distribution company, just to put this film in theaters where it belongs.

Films I didn't see, but probably should have before attempting this list: The Fountain, Shut up and Sing, Letters From Iwo Jima, Three Times, The Death of Mr. Lazarescu, Half Nelson

Labels:


Continue reading...

Thursday, December 21, 2006

The Blog Does Not Rest For God or Commerce

It's no secret that most of the working Western world all but shuts down from December 20 through the end of the year, but the media always makes a valient attempt at making it look like the lights are still on, even if it means the TODAY show has to scrape the bottom of the parent company's barrel in order to compensate for the absence of Merdith Viera, Matt Lauer AND Al Roker*** (who is actually potentially not on vacation, but pre-emptively benched -- last year, in the midst of a truly horrifying segment on holiday parties, my boyfriend caught him dipping a slice of ham into his glass of champagne on camera. I mean, do whatever gets you off in private, Roker, but let's keep that kind of thing away from the kids).

ANYWAY, I'm writing this post because it seems like at least half the A-list bloggers I read have made some kind of mention of their vacation status/location over the past day or so, and yet, unlike mainstream mediators, their blogs go on despite their physical displacement. Whitney at Pop Candy, for instance, promises she'll post tomorrow about the media consumed on her "looong drive" to Nashville today. The Reeler, meanwhile, is in "godforsaken California," and yet he's still blogging about the minutia of the New York film scene.
I like this -- I like it that blog ethic demands that the feeds be fed, vaguely-God-centric holidays be damned.

But me? According to Technorati, no one's reading this, anyway, so I'm just going to go to New Jersey tomorrow and leave the computer at home. Hopefully we'll make it back to civilization on Sunday in time to catch the program of racist and otherwise inappropriate Christmas cartoons at the Pioneer Theater.

I was going to add a picture of Al to this post, but Blogger's upload feature isn't working. Check it out here.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Loving Sleeping Dogs LIe


Sleeping Dogs Lie
(or, Stay, as it was called when I saw it at Sundance) opened on a couple of screens a couple of months ago to zero fanfare, and has since disappeared. It's too bad; I don't think anyone expected a movie about a girl trying to tell her boyfriend about a regretable act of beastiality would set the box office on fire, but I had hoped that at least the bloggers would have given it a chance. So I was happy to see Mike D'Angelo's defense of the film in indieWIRE's year end poll:
A disquieting sweetness and sincerity lurk beneath the film's admittedly juvenile surface; those who avoided what they assumed to be an endless parade of asinine canine-boner gags missed the most incisive examination of long-term romantic relationships in ages. Granted, it looks like crap...but, then, so does Inland Empire.
I plan to put my own best-of-the-year list together tomorrow after tonight's screening of Children of Men; right now, it looks like Bobcat Goldthwaite's little movie about a girl who blew her dog is going to be on it, and in a pretty high position.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Morning Links, 12-19-06



  • Remember last week, when you thought Michel Gondry was some kind of foot genius? See incontrovertible evidence to the contrary above.
  • The Guardian's film staff and friends count up 50 Lost Movie Classics. It's an inspired list, the kind of alternative contemporary history that's definitely worth keeping in mind when updating the Netflix queue. Sample selection: "#33 Less Than Zero -- An example of an over-rated book being beaten by the film version...It has this amazing sadness and helplessness to it and at its heart there's a career-defining performance from Robert Downey Jr."
  • Nobody loves Frances Gumm, even when she's being marketed as Judy Garland.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Monday, December 18, 2006

The Painted Veil

In today's Hollywood Reporter, Anne Thompson has a rundown on the spat between Bob Yari and Warner Brothers over The Painted Veil. Yuri alleges WB isn't mounting the Oscar campaign they promised; he says, "Someone up there wants the film buried." WB's Alan Horn says it isn't true -- he blames the China for Veil's release delay and slow-moving marketing campaign. Warner China, a partnership between WB and the China Film Group, co-produced the film, providing unprecedented location access in exchange for final cut approval for the Chinese government. Director John Curran and producer/star Edward Norton allegedly haggled with Chinese censors over "38 seconds over six scenes," with Norton appealing to "family friend" Dick Parsons for help; Parson's lobbying apparently meant nothing to the Chinese government, and a compromise was reached. The film opens in New York on Wednesday.

It strikes me as strange that WB doesn't have more faith in The Painted Veil as an Oscar contender. It certainly *looks* like Oscar bait, at least on paper: it's a vanity project nurtured by Norton for the better part of a decade, based on a novel by Somerset Maugham; it's a romance set against a sweeping, exotic locale with slight politcal undertones; and, it's a vehicle for two Oscar-nominated stars (Norton and Naomi Watts), one which allows both to demonstrate they can emote in early-20th-century costume. In practice, it's a visually sumptuous mangling of Maugham with a handful of memorable moments; it's extremely classy, but mostly brainless. In short, it's Oscar gold.

About three-quarters of the way through, there's a lovely sequence no more than ten minutes long, in which the characters played by Watts and Norton -- who have spent the previous 70 minutes of the film blaming one another for their loveless marriage, with Watts' adulterous Kitty essentially held prisoner by Norton in a rural Chinese village in the middle of a cholera epidemic -- get drunk and tumble into bed, and proceed to float into what is essentially a courtship montage. Curran puts the sequence together almost like a silent film, foregoing meaningful dialogue in order to impart information through the clanging harmony of Eric Satie's Gnossienne and Watts' batting eyelashes. That sequence redeemed The Painted Veil for me, at least up to a point; there's always some pleasure to be had in watching good-looking people convincingly fall in love, and in this case, Curran and his actors manage the transition from ecstasy to inevitable tragedy nicely.

It's worth wondering why Norton, an actor who could probably have any role he likes, spent so many years of his life fighting to bring this novel to the screen. In typical Maugham fashion, aspects of the story, and especially its view of male/female relations, are at once alarmingly anachronistic and embarrassingly timeless. At some point, a decision was made to truncate much of Kitty's third act, ostensibly to beef up Norton's role and to take better advantage of the secured Chinese locations. As a result, Kitty's spiritual redemption, which is supposed to be the point of the thing, feels barely sketched out. Maugham's usual passion/contempt for women (or, perhaps more accurately, passion for contemptible women) is on display here, but the novel's turn towards genuine sympathy for its heroine is almost completely lost.

In movie form, Kitty is at best selfish and shallow, with even her eventual turn to charity coming off as little more than a self-serving effort to eliminate boredom. She seems to accept Walter's proposal initially because she assumes she'll be her husband's constant object of desire, not realizing that he's a serious man looking to acquire a piece of designer arm candy. Norton's Walter is pretty much the typical Maugham "hero": a seemingly weak man who lets himself fall for an insouciant woman, and then punishes both of them for her inability to care for him. Walter and Kitty don't fall in love because Kitty has become a different, better person; Kitty and Walter fall in love because Kitty's display of beauty and vivacity moves Walter to temporarily forget that this woman makes him hate himself. This is vintage Maugham; what's interesting is that the filmmakers chose to end the narrative with Walter's death, thus leaving Kitty, pregnant with what is quite possibly another man's baby, alive and redeemed by the love her martyred husband. Remarkably, Maugham actually gave the girl a bit more credit than that.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Morning Links, 12-18-06


  • "If someone looks like he hasn't either bathed or been outdoors in weeks, he's probably a blogger. Yes, even humble bloggers are invited to leave their attics and basements during Shmooze Season." As if we needed it, Peter Bart provides more incontrovertable evidence that he is even more of an asshole in his obsolescence. [Via The Carpetbagger]
  • Arin and Susan have won another prize.
  • I've been happy to see Michael Mann's Miami Vice pop up on a couple of year end wrap-ups; yes, the script is mostly inane, and yes, both Gong Li and Colin Farrell would have been better off having their voices dubbed; but just for the fact that it takes itself seriously as a treatise on loyalty and identity, I think it's pretty amazing, and on an almost-purely visual level, it stands up against Mann's best films. Rob at The Projection Booth compares the theatrical version to that which recently came out on DVD. [Via The House Next Door]
  • Times is tough all around: Vincent Gallo has allegedly raised his fee for sex, although I can't find the page on his website where he's made the announcement.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Friday, December 15, 2006

Robert Altman Retrospective at IFC Center


Just got word that the IFC Center will be hosting a 19-day Robert Altman retrospective, starting January 5. From the press release:
The program will include more than twenty of Altman’s films, including the masterworks McCABE AND MRS. MILLER, NASHVILLE, THE PLAYER and SHORTCUTS; his breakthrough, M*A*S*H; the groundbreaking faux-documentary series TANNER ’88, about a fictional presidential candidate on the real-life campaign trail,; Altman’s first feature, the location-shot B-movie THE DELINQUENTS; rarely screened early works such as THAT COLD DAY IN THE PARK and IMAGES; and his final film, A PRAIRIE HOME COMPANION. A schedule will be announced shortly.
I'm hoping McCabe will screen before I leave for Park City on the 17th; I'd also love to see The Long Goodbye on the big screen.

Labels: ,


Continue reading...

Morning Links, 12-15-06


  • That Little Round-Headed Boy has produced the first end-of-year wrap list that I actually enjoyed reading.
  • The Dreamgirls backlash marches on: Ryan Stewart, Aaron Hillis and Tony Scott collectively shrug. As usual, Dave Kehr has the best 25-words-or-less summation: "Jamie Foxx is in it because he won an Oscar a couple of years ago, and Eddie Murphy is in it to prove he’s not turning into Bill Cosby."
  • This is interesting: Variety asks a few critics to name films that shouldn't have won Oscars, and films that didn't that should have.
  • Manohla's really on a roll lately. She neatly sums up the problem with The Good German thusly: "Yet while the language routinely waxes raw in The Good German, the most striking difference between it and a Hollywood film like Casablanca aren’t the expletives, the new film’s calculated cynicism or even that glimpse of bedroom coupling; it’s that the older film feels as if it was made for the satisfaction of the audience while the other feels as if it was made for that of the director alone."

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Not to looking like a zombie is hard

I had to send someone a headshot today. I don't have headshots, or for that matter, servicable pictures of myself of any sort, so I just sat in from of my MacBook and fired up Photo Booth. This was the worst of the outtakes:
Here's the one I eventually sent:

Labels:


Continue reading...

"Bob Dylan", or just Harvey in a skinny suit?



I've read this on twelve blogs today, most recently The Reeler: Bob Dylan is trying to get an injunction on Factory Girl, The Weinstein Company's Edie Sedgwick biopic, because it portrays a character based on him as having something to do with Sedgwick's drug-fueled death. The producers have said the character, which Hayden Christensen plays in his first post-Skywalker stretch, is a composite of Dylan, Jim Morrisson and Mick Jagger; Bob Dylan's lawyer has seen the trailer, and he begs to differ:
"You appear to be laboring under the misunderstanding that merely changing the name of a character or making him a purported fictional composite will immunize you from suit. That is not so. Even though Mr. Dylan's name is not used, the portrayal remains both defamatory and a violation of Mr. Dylan's right of publicity."
Factory Girl has essentially been in production since the day Edie Sedgwick died, and even though it's due to come out on December 27, everyone says it isn't finished, and most of us who have watched the trailer suspect it won't be very good. I have to wonder: did Dylan's lawyers act alone, or did Harvey call in a favor to buy him the time he needs to abuse director George Hickenlooper into abandoning the project so it can be shelved indefinitely? Stranger things have happened.

Labels: , ,


Continue reading...

Golden Globe nominations

Remember when I said I wasn't going to do this kind of shit anymore? I should really stick to that, but this is just the Globes, which we all know are the result of Italian gossip columnists making lists of which Hollywood celebrities they'd like to watch getting messy drunk. That makes it just a little bit of fun to pretend like it matters. I have two thoughts:

1. Did the 9/11 films open too early? Or, were foreign critics, who could look at the films outside the American, "omigodits9/11" bubble of sensitivity, simply unimpressed?

2. Two foreign language nominees directed and produced by Hollywood A-listers; all five nominees distributed by major studios. They're not even pretending like they care about anything outside the margins anymore.

Full list here.

Labels:


Continue reading...

Morning Links, 12-14-06


  • Keith Uhlich posts a question at The House Next Door and gives me a twofer: "What movies have you walked out of?" A judge has decided that he needs to see Alpha Dog, the ONLY film I walked out of at Sundance 2006, before he decides whether or not to let it open. Let's hope he's an astute critic...
  • Via Matt Dentler: Premiere has re-launched their website, adding a bloggy news page. Looks good so far; into the RSS it goes.
  • What could possibly embarrass Yoko Ono?
  • I'm looking for a place where I can write long-form-ish reviews. Online or print, doesn't matter. Don't care about the pay. If you have any suggestions, please email me at karina AT vidiocydotcom.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Sundance in Second Life


It took me all day, but I finally finished a write-up on Sundance Channel's just-announced excursion into Second Life. Read the whole thing here. In summary: for the niche that already cares about films like Four Eyed Monsters and already dabbles in things like Second Life, this is a dream come true. But seen on a larger scale, corporate entertainment companies have a long way to go when it comes to integrating themselves in the virtual world.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Morning Links, 12-13-06


  • Above: Scarlett Johansson strips down to her bra and panties, swings from a rope, cashes check.
  • WagerWeb.com has posted odds for the next celebrity DUI. I love it how a bet on Mary-Kate Olsen pays out 13:1, but her sister Ashley isn't even ranked.
  • Both of the above links come via WeSmirch, which I am obsessed with.
  • The Sundance Channel is launching a screening room inside Second Life. More on this after I've had coffee.
  • Is the whole of academia *really* obsessing over the historical accuracy of Apocalypto, or has Disney, by making Mel nearly unavailable for interviews, given the press little choice but to seek quotes from assistant professors from minor universities?

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

One Borat Lawsuit Down, and Fox Probably Doesn't Care How Many Are Left To Go



Via WeSmirch (the new Techmeme, for pop culture and gossip): an L.A. judge has thrown out a suit filed by those frat boys who claimed they were duped into getting drunk and wistfully bemoaning their lack of slave ownership in Borat. At the height of Boratmania (a dark and mercifully brief era which will no doubt go into the history books as a regretable side effect of temporary post-millenial insanity), TMZ's Harvey Levin predicted that other studios might look at the success Fox stumbled into with this film, see that ethically questionable filmmaking practices could be financially advantageous, and thus not only allow filmmakers to bend previously set-in-stone rules, but actually budget with the expectation that legal departments would need to quietly put out any fires that might ensue. With the courts now having flatly denied these plaintiffs' claim twice (they've been seeking to have their scene removed from all existing prints and future releases; one assumes they have a seperate suit seeking punitive damages on the way), I have to wonder if Harvey wasn't on to something. Could the traditional release form and all it represents be headed for the grave?

Above, my none-too-enthusiastic review of the film, for Netscape.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Inland Empire a huge hit (relatively speaking, of course)

If I haven't written much about Inland Empire, it's only because I'm deeply ambivalent about it, both as a work of art and as a work for sale. I've seen the film just once, and though if I could bring myself to sit through it again, I might feel differently, I stand by my original impression: if Lynch was willing to part with about 45 minutes out of the middle, he'd have made a masterpiece. Still, I'm all for an artist like Lynch using his stature amongst actors and foreign financiers to get something like this made, and using his personal fortune to get it out there.

Now it looks like Lynch's self-distribution gambit is working -- at least, here in New York. The Reeler has the numbers for Inland Empire's first week at the IFC Center, and they're quite impressive. Not only has the film broken just about every box office record in IFC's 18-month history, but there seems to be a never-ending supply of Lynchmaniacs waiting for a peek at the film: "All evening shows of the film have sold out hours in advance, with hundreds turned away from capacity screenings and record numbers of advance tickets sold. Hungry ticket-seekers have offered up to $75 to buy tickets to sold-out shows."

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Justin Rice, Brooklyn superstar


Whitney at Pop Candy has an interview with Justin Rice of the band Bishop Allen and star of Andrew Bujalski's Mutual Appreciation. He talks about his sudden, brief period of overexposure in relation to that film:
Well, we shot Mutual Appreciation almost three years ago...And then, honestly, I kind of forgot about it. I think the thing that surprised me most was when it came out. One day, sort of out of the blue, Mutual Appreciation was getting a theatrical release in New York, and on a Friday, all of a sudden, it was like total media saturation in the city. They put up posters of me all over my neighborhood. And for that day and the next day, I felt a little bit shell-shocked. My face was everywhere.
Embarrassing personal anecdote: I saw Mutual Appreciation for the first time at SXSW in 2005, and proceded to gush about it at every opportunity on Cinematical. That spring, I was living in a basement apartment in Williamsburg with a shaky internet connection, and I would often go to a coffeeshop called Fix to work. Justin Rice used to go in there to get coffee at least once a week, but every time I saw him, I was too starstruck to go talk to him -- even though it was my job to talk to indie film stars. I think I was also worried that I'd introduce myself, he'd recognize me as "that girl who writes about Mutual on the internet like twice a week," and have me arrested for stalking him. Which I wasn't. Really.

Labels: , , , , ,


Continue reading...

Monday, December 11, 2006

The Battle Over South Park



Is South Park a show for liberals? Are its creators libertarians? Or is it actual a tool of the Right, their main weapon in an attempt to "overthrow the liberal media and political correctness"? Inspired by REASON mag's interview with creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, I put together a brief summary of the ideological battle over the cartoon for Netscape. Above, see a clip from the infamous Scientology episode.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Continue reading...

Friday, December 08, 2006

Gone for the weekend



Nick and I are going to Connecticut to celebrate our anniversary. I'll be back late Sunday or Monday with some thoughts on The Holiday, The Painted Veil, and cinematic love. Speaking of, see Miss Kubelik running back to Mr. Baxter, above.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

More on Paglia on "backstreet floozies"

Update on the post below: I found the full US Weekly Camille Paglia interview, via Ann Althouse, via Memorandum. I like Althouse's closing take:
As to the young celebs caught up in crotchgate.... They've grabbed your attention. They are the fixation of the whole world right now. That's something. It doesn't matter at all, really. But it's an impressive feat, however pointless.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Morning Links, 12-8-06


  • I never met him myself, but as I work for a major technology company, I know quite a few people who knew James Kim, and all of them are really fucking upset about this.
  • Mr. Skin.com ranks the best nude scenes of the year, thereby handing Salma Hayek the most prestigious award she'll ever earn. [Via Cinematical]
  • Lindsay Lohan sent a cracked-out email to her friends and employees, informing them that Al Gore had offered to "help" her. TMZ called Al Gore to fact check; Al Gore said, "Uh ... not so much."
  • I can't find the actual interview online, but apparently, someone at US Weekly called up Camille Paglia and asked her to comment on Britney's latest, uh, tour. Camille cites the infamous VMA kiss as the turning point in Britney's career: "Britney looked toned, in control of her career and it was up to her to take the next step. Literally, from that kiss, from that moment onward, Britney has spiraled out of control. It's like Madonna gave her the kiss of death! Britney is throwing it away!"

Labels: , , , , ,


Continue reading...

Thursday, December 07, 2006

David Lynch = 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist?

To his biggest fans, Lynch's interest in 9/11 "countertheories", is not new news -- he's been posting about it on his members-only blog for awhile. At Netscape today, I traced this interest back to the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the founder of Transcendental Meditation, who allegedly predicted the attacks of 9/11. Lynch, of course, funds the David Lynch Foundation, which promotes the Maharishi's teachings in schools throughout the States.

I would LOVE to see David Lynch make a 9/11 movie. Projected title: Terrorists in Bunny Suits.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Morning Links, 12-07-06



  • There are two possible ways to react to the announcement of the National Board of Review awards: you can either issue a grand proclamation stating your intent to ignore them, or, you can admit that, however silly the group and their choices often seem, their lists sometimes have to power to start (or reveal) conversations about films that we would otherwise not be having. The Carpetbagger takes the latter tactic; he thinks the NBR might give Blood Diamond the push it needs to overcome the prevailing opinion that its nothin' but a liberal lecture: "[It] gets mixed reviews among the mentionocracy, but the Academy members that the Bagger talks to — he actually knows a few, but addresses them as Sir and Madam — love this film. It’s got Message, Stars, and now all its needs is some hallowed Box Office to hop on Big Mo’s train."
  • Orson Welles drinks and shills. See video above.
  • At least she has a sense of humor about it: Britney has issued a statement winking at her refusal to wear panties. Via TMZ.


Labels: , ,


Continue reading...

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

New Netscape Updates, 12-06-06

We unveiled a few hot new features at Netscape today. My favorite, which didn't make it into today's announcement, is the RSS feeds for each Anchor's Commentary (for those unfamiliar with the site: at Netscape, "Anchors" are editors who essentially blog over the top stories of the day, providing background info on the story or the site, and adding related links, further reporting and analysis). You can subscribe to my RSS feed here, or bookmark this page.

Labels: ,


Continue reading...

National Board of Review Resurrects Clint Eastwood's Oscar Hopes

Wow ... the National Board of Review Awards came out this afternoon, and the slate is full of surprises. Biggest of all comes in the biggest category: Clint Eastwood's Letters from Iwo Jima for Best Picture? Seriously? It's a film that virtually no one has been talking about, largely because its companion film, Flags of Our Fathers, basically came and went when released earlier this fall. The film was originally scheduled to open in February, but Warner Brothers recently moved the released date up to December 20, apparently due to the hunch that Flags isn't going to attract any significant awards attention.

The trades haven't reviewed Iwo Jima yet. In mid-October, David Poland devoted almost 2000 words to explaining why Clint Eastwood can't pull off war movies; a couple of weeks later, he postulated that Iwo Jima (which as of that writing, he had not seen) "could be a film that critics are craving… an agreed upon serious film without the vote-splitting love/hate thing going on with Babel and Little Children. And if New York or L.A.['s critics circles] or both went for Iwo Jima as their Best Picture, suddenly it is in serious Oscar play."

At this point, I don't think either Babel or Little Children has any real chance to break through the twin roadblocks of The Departed and Dreamgirls; though it's still unseen by pretty much everyone *but* the National Board of Review, the blessing of that org might just be the push the Eastwood film needs to break this race wide open. At this point, I don't think anything else set to be released in the next three weeks could manage it.

Other WTF? items on NBR's list: Djimon Hounso of Blood Diamond and Catherine O'Hara from For Your Consideration were named the Best Supporting Actors; Blood Diamond and Flags of Our Fathers made the 10 Best Films list (that might give the former a credibility with art house audiences that its middling reviews have not); Dreamgirls and The Queen did not.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

All I Want For Whatevermas, Part One

I just updated my Amazon Wish List, to include Under the Rainbow, John Carlyle's memoir which includes a detailed account of his affair with Judy Garland (confusingly, Under the Rainbow is also the title of a different Garland-family chronicle, a ten-year-old exploitography on Liza Minnelli); and Sound and Vision: A Music Video Reader, which seems to whip in about out of availability every week or so, and which I've been try to acquire since roughly 1998. It's back in print as of this writing, but who knows for how long (hinthinthint)?

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Stone Temple of Love?

From Idolator (which is quickly supplanting Defamer as my favorite Gawker blog; it feels fresh and not completely jaded, whereas Gawker and Defamer both seem to be in slump, as though they haven't quite figured out what they can offer in a world in which Perez Hilton has stolen their "steal an image and wait for the lawsuits/mainstream press to roll in" game) comes the news that the geniuses who brought us Flavor of Love are hard at work on a new reality dating series. This one apparently stars an unnamed "famous, sexy, bad boy rocker. He was the lead singer of a famous 90's rock band and he still tours today!"

My guess is Scott Weiland, but the Billy Corgan scenario outlined by an Idolator commenter ("if only for the episode where Courtney Love shows up to perform Bridgitte Neilson's role of "possessive weirdo") sounds like it would make for much better television.

Labels: , , , , ,


Continue reading...
Morning Links, 12-6-06



  • Manohla makes it clear that Inland Empire is an awful lot of work to sit through, but ends up generally recommending it. I'm torn myself. There are moments of pure, cinematic horror and pleasure in the film that rival anything I've ever seen on screen, but in its current incarnaton, I can't imagine ever being able to watch it for a second time. I wrote about the picture here; see video I shot of Lynch at NYFF above.
  • Someone call the fat scholars to analyze this one: